Missingno in FRLG?

[Reuben]

Does anyone know if there will be Missingnos in FRLG? :think: :think: :think:

[boltAge]

No. Missingno was left in RBY by mistake, and has been corrected in Yellow. There will be no more Missingnos in the future Pokemon games.

[Iceman3k]

I seriously doubt Missingno will be in Fire Red/Leaf Green.

[Nefarious]

I hope the duplicating items trick is still there. I like to duplicate rare candies. :oops:

[Steven]

Nope, not going to be in there, like he said which = no rare candies trick. I wish they did put him in there to be like an easter egg, kind of like a ghost that no matter how many pokeballs you throw at him they will just miss. Then he'd be lvl 100, and killed in one hit...

[VenusaurTrainer]

I think they should put it in their because it could be tradition.

[Bakura2004]

Wouldn't it be funny if the creaters of FR/LG leave in another pokemon like missingno by acident :lol:

[Ironshell Blastoise]

While it'd be nice if he was still around (without all the excess glitching) they won't have him.

What I'd like to know, is what Pokemon were they making/developing and didn't finish that was leftover as the missingno that we know?

[Bakura2004]

While it'd be nice if he was still around (without all the excess glitching) they won't have him.

What I'd like to know, is what Pokemon were they making/developing and didn't finish that was leftover as the missingno that we know?
Well, the leading theory is that Missingno was just a filler pokemon for the game. Since the game had 151 Pokemon and it's max capacity was 255 they included missingnos to fill in the slots. I guess not having anything at all was worse than haveing missingnos.

[GreenF!reR@ge]

lol, unless Nintendo heas become a bunch of retards they won't put Missingno in again :oops:

[SnowTiger]

Well I liked Missingno cause you could do that mulitply number trick, too bad it wont be in FR/LG :sad:

[sdp]

Well missingno was in G/S/C and R/S so it could be.

[dhee]

Well missingno was in G/S/C and R/S so it could be.

Sdp, it's not likely that Missingno is going to be put in FRLG even though I miss the Rare Candy trick. I think Nintendo would have already learned about this trick and had enough sense into not programming Missingno into FRLG since Nintendo doesn't want Pokemon to be raised to Lvl 100 by rare candies.
So I think Missingno is gone for good unless you have the GS/PAR code for Missingno.

[sdp]

Sdp, it's not likely that Missingno is going to be put in FRLG even though I miss the Rare Candy trick. I think Nintendo would have already learned about this trick and had enough sense into not programming Missingno into FRLG since Nintendo doesn't want Pokemon to be raised to Lvl 100 by rare candies.
So I think Missingno is gone for good unless you have the GS/PAR code for Missingno.
Probably not the same glitch but it will still be there in itself because of programing, that is why he's also there on GSC and R/S

[Prinsess Leia]

There won't be a missingno programed into the main game(I hope there is but.. It's doubtfull... Mabey next game) Although useing a cheat device missigno and other Glitch pokemon are avalable. I would doubt FR LG will be diffrent from this tradidion of haveing glitch pokemon accesable with Action Replay codes.

[Ironshell Blastoise]

You can't cheat somehting that isn't int he game at all. Its like playing Tony Hawk's Pro Skater and trying to find a code to let you use a hairless Pikachu that skatboards on a squirtle shell. It's not in the game programming at all, and therefore, cannot be cheated.

And I thought we already finished the Missingno in FRLG discussion MONTHS ago. HE'S NOT THERE. SHUT UP

[SuperSaiyanX]

I have proof that there is Missingno in FireRed. Get me at superdude655@hotmail.com for the puic

[Shadow Siren]

^Don't revive old threads!

"OH MODDY!"

V Over a month old is an understatment, this is nearly 2 YEARS old

[Fossil Fusion]

Dont revive old threads over a month old and dont double post read the rules

[Seawolf]

^Don't revive old threads!

"OH MODDY!"

V Over a month old is an understatment, this is nearly 2 YEARS old

Yeah, I'm here. And yes, reviving ancient threads is a no-no. Keep that in mind.

*Locked