PDA

View Full Version : Which band is better, Paramore or Arcade Fire?


Metallic Houndoom
04-26-2009, 02:39 PM
I like Paramore more but my mate thinks Arcade Fire will be more popular.

Orthar
04-26-2009, 02:45 PM
I think they'll both die out because they are both commercialized garbage with little to no talent whatsoever.

Black Hawk
04-26-2009, 04:34 PM
Paramore is the best band ever psh.

Wisp
04-26-2009, 04:38 PM
I think that, Paramore have the fan support but are overplayed in my opinion.
Whereas, Arcade Fire aren't as popular but are very unique.

I personally like Arcade Fire more, Paramore is heard all he time over here, they're starting to get a little annoying. ^^;;

complexmanifold
04-26-2009, 06:22 PM
I think it is interesting how the apparent measure of how good a band is how much they are not well known and not commercialized, rather than simply listening to their sound with no external factors considered in, music in its purest form. I voted Arcade Fire.

-Zodeon
04-26-2009, 06:27 PM
Neither band are really my taste.

Dark Turtwig
04-26-2009, 07:03 PM
I really don't listen to either (when I have a choice at least, I hear Paramore all the time), so I don't have much of an opinion on this subject. May I ask though, where is the 'neither' option on the poll?

Rohypnol
04-26-2009, 07:08 PM
May I ask though, where is the 'neither' option on the poll?

Neither = gtfo the thread.

And Paramore. =3

Black Hawk
04-26-2009, 07:11 PM
I think it is interesting how the apparent measure of how good a band is how much they are not well known and not commercialized, rather than simply listening to their sound with no external factors considered in, music in its purest form. I voted Arcade Fire.

Your reasoning is just excellent... why didn't I think of that?

Orthar
04-26-2009, 08:00 PM
I think it is interesting how the apparent measure of how good a band is how much they are not well known and not commercialized, rather than simply listening to their sound with no external factors considered in, music in its purest form. I voted Arcade Fire.

That's not the only reasoning in my thinking. But, common sense would point to that music that is often commercialized heavily would be less inspired and created to make a quick buck, rather then putting time and effort before a song.

Paramore blows, as does Arcade Fire. Both have little to no emotion, and are filled to the brim with cliches and hook lyrics.

Stinky
04-26-2009, 08:08 PM
I agree with King, Paramore ftw.

complexmanifold
04-26-2009, 09:10 PM
That's not the only reasoning in my thinking. But, common sense would point to that music that is often commercialized heavily would be less inspired and created to make a quick buck, rather then putting time and effort before a song.


Sounds like a bunch of assumptions created by disgruntled musical elitists.

Vaughn
04-26-2009, 10:54 PM
What's Arcade Fire? Oh wel, I voted for Paramore.

George Jefferson
04-27-2009, 03:48 PM
Pearl Jam.

:>

Tombi
04-27-2009, 05:41 PM
Sounds like a bunch of assumptions created by disgruntled musical elitists.

That's because they are.

And they're true, too.

I haven't voted, as I hate both. c:

@Kenneth: Yes. Pearl Jam. xD

George Jefferson
04-27-2009, 06:00 PM
Pearl Jam.

:>



That's because they are.

And they're true, too.

I haven't voted, as I hate both. c:

@Kenneth: Yes. Pearl Jam. xD

My, the multi-quote option is underused.

Daughter of Mew
04-27-2009, 06:08 PM
Cannibal Corpse

Out of those two, I'll go with Paramore, because I've actually heard Paramore before.