Wanna battle? - Pokemon Forum

Chicagoan · #1 06-07-2007, 03:09 PM

Double... no legends.

Beech Daly · #2 06-07-2007, 03:30 PM

Two things for me:

1. Legends? Huh? I've yet to even trrain any of my legends (just BARELY trained Dialga and Palkia), so I would not even bother with them anyway.

2. I take a lot of underused Pokemon. Everyone already has a Garchomp, a Weavile, and a Lucario in competitve play. I'm already behind because I am still trying to get the rest of my original team from last month (mainly because of what happened from May 15) so I am really with a brand new team at the moment, which half of them are part of the UU and maybe an NU in there too. I know everyone wants to win, but I am winning with Pokemon that no one had expected to bring in (although I am like 4-4 right now and in a losing streak now, sigh).

Chicagoan · #3 06-07-2007, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beech Daly

Two things for me:

1. Legends? Huh? I've yet to even trrain any of my legends (just BARELY trained Dialga and Palkia), so I would not even bother with them anyway.

2. I take a lot of underused Pokemon. Everyone already has a Garchomp, a Weavile, and a Lucario in competitve play. I'm already behind because I am still trying to get the rest of my original team from last month (mainly because of what happened from May 15) so I am really with a brand new team at the moment, which half of them are part of the UU and maybe an NU in there too. I know everyone wants to win, but I am winning with Pokemon that no one had expected to bring in (although I am like 4-4 right now and in a losing streak now, sigh).

Don't forget Tyranitar.

I use neither of them :) I hate those.

charmeleonblaze · #4 06-07-2007, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chicagoan

Double... no legends.

At least say what your team is. We don't want a lv. 60 Pokemon going up against a lv. 100, now do we?

Beech Daly · #5 06-07-2007, 03:43 PM

Yeah, good point. Tyranitar.

And yeah, we do need levels on here so we can match up or come close.
And assuming it's 6-on-6?

Chicagoan · #6 06-07-2007, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charmeleonblaze

At least say what your team is. We don't want a lv. 60 Pokemon going up against a lv. 100, now do we?

Mines are all lv100... But if yours aren't we can do lv100 double battle :)

Then, wanna battle, or not?

Beech Daly · #7 06-07-2007, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chicagoan

Mines are all lv100... But if yours aren't we can do lv100 double battle :)

Then, wanna battle, or not?

Darn. I only have three actual level 100s. I have a lot of 40s... been focusing on completing this Pokedex and getting my original team back.

charmeleonblaze · #8 06-07-2007, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beech Daly

Darn. I only have three actual level 100s. I have a lot of 40s... been focusing on completing this Pokedex and getting my original team back.

You're still lucky to even have any. I DON'T have any. How do all you guys on this website get so many Pokemon to lv. 100? In all my years of playing Pokemon, the only Pokemon I've gotten to lv. 100 without cheating(which is stupid BTW), are a Suicune in Crystal and Charizard in Firered.

Todd6 · #9 06-07-2007, 04:27 PM

I up for a battle lvl 100